Cassatie

Cassatie

Sommige zaken liggen zo complex of principieel dat moet worden doorgeprocedeerd tot de Hoge Raad. Procedures bij de Hoge Raad worden gevoerd door gespecialiseerde advocaten, cassatieadvocaten. Houthoff heeft een van de grootste en meest toonaangevende cassatiepraktijken van Nederland. Onze cassatieadvocaten zijn volledig geïntegreerd in onze overige praktijk- en sectorteams. Ze kennen de context waarin een geschil speelt en zijn vastberaden om de beste oplossing te vinden. Het team combineert strategisch advies met diepgaande kennis van de sector waar de cliënt in opereert. Het succes van het cassatieteam is internationaal erkend en onze cassatieadvocaten worden geraadpleegd door zowel andere advocatenkantoren als ondernemingen en overheden.

Het cassatieteam van Houthoff heeft in de loop der jaren talloze baanbrekende uitspraken van de Hoge Raad verkregen.
  • “Leading arbitration team in the Netherlands, active both on investor-state and commercial arbitration matters. Successful in the world’s most high-value complex disputes matters.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration (2020 Edition)
  • “Ability to think outside the box in very complex and high-stakes matters.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration (2020 Edition)
  • “The team consists of lawyers with different capabilities/areas of expertise which makes the team well equipped to handle a variety of cases.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration (2020 Edition)
  • “A well balanced team with outstanding arbitration skills. The really know when to push through and when to settle. Compared to other firms the Houthoff team combines outstanding legal knowledge with practical business skills.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration (2020 Edition)
  • “Houthoff has a large and outstanding arbitration team that is capable of handling high-end and large-scale arbitrations. They have extensive experience with ICC and other international arbitrations.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration (2020 Edition)
  • “This practice is unique because Houthoff helped us eventually win the case and as client of Houthoff, I feel very delighted to be working with such a professional, responsible and talented team of lawyers. They are always patient and work with great passion and efficiency.”
  • First Tier firm
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration (2020 Edition)
  • “The team is very experienced in a wide range of disputes and provides commercial and user-friendly advice.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2020 Edition)
  • First Tier firm
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2020 Edition)
  • “The team is very quick to respond, friendly, easy to talk to. They team is efficient and very hard-working.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2020 Edition)
  • “Sources praise the firm for being ‘very proactive and creative’ and ‘always very well prepared in supporting us.’”
    Chambers Europe, Dispute Resolution (2020 Edition)
  • “Clients highlight the team’s international capabilities, noting that they are ‘very good at dealing with cross-border work’ and have ‘very good knowledge of international financing and documentation, and are very good at adapting to different litigation systems.’”
    Chambers Europe, Dispute Resolution (2020 Edition)
  • First Tier firm
    Chambers Global & Europe, Dispute Resolution (2019 Edition)
  • First Tier firm
    Chambers Global, Dispute Resolution (2020 Edition)
  • “One client says: ‘The team is excellent and the quality of work is outstanding,’ and adds that the lawyers are ‘very technical, objective and clear and deliver high-quality services.’”  
    Chambers Europe, Dispute Resolution (2019 Edition)
  • “Sparring partners who have a lot of trial experience and the ability to assess risks.”
    Chambers Europe, Dispute Resolution (2019 Edition)
  • “The ‘consistently excellent, very responsive’ team at Houthoff is, according to one client, ‘in a class of its own’ and its lawyers are ‘tactically astute, intellectually great, and very commercial in their approach.’”    
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2019 Edition)
  • “Houthoff’s ‘exceptional’ group has 'considerable experience in ICC arbitrations’ and stands out for the ‘accuracy and clarity of its legal advice’; it is also a key name for large-scale investment arbitration.” 
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration (2019 Edition)
  • First Tier firm
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2019 Edition)
  • First Tier firm
    Chambers Global, Dispute Resolution (2019 Edition)

Voorbeelden van onze expertise

  • beroep tegen de onteigening van de Hedwigepolder (lopende zaak)
  • succesvol beroep in de Meavita-zaak
  • succesvol beroep over aansprakelijkheid voor de dijkdoorbraak bij Wilnis
  • verschillende procedures rond de onteigening van SNS
  • verschillende procedures in de Yukos-zaak
  • succesvolle verdediging van het faillissementsakkoord inzake Lehman Brothers
  • succesvolle verdediging van het faillissement van Nederlanse financieringsdochters van de Braziliaanse telecomgiant Oi
  • Advised Vi Holding, the largest shareholder of aluminum multinational Vimetco N.V. on several proceedings in the Netherlands and the UK relating to a transaction with regard to a significant minority stake in Vimetco. Disputes arose with respect to certain obligations under this transaction, and also a third party initiated proceedings in both the UK and the Netherlands following it.

  • Advised Aurelius, through its investment vehicle Capricorn, in lodging several claims in the Netherlands, relating to, among others, (a) the voidance of several intercompany transactions of the Oi Group which have been to the detriment of the group's creditors and (b) to prevent the ailing Brazilian parent company from borrowing any more money from one its Dutch subsidiaries.
  • The Unbundling Act requires that the integrated energy companies unbundle their network companies, and forbids privatization thereof. Three large energy companies argued that the act infringes on the right to free movement of capital and therefore does not bind them. The Dutch Supreme Court found that the Unbundling Act is in line with the right to free movement of capital. The Supreme Court reasons that the objectives of the Unbundling Act are ‘important reasons in the public interest’ and that the entailing restrictions.

     

    Click here for the judgement of the Supreme Court. 

  • In a groundbreaking judgment, the Supreme Court found that civil-law notaries do not (automatically) have to refuse service when alienation constitutes a breach of contract in respect of a third party. The Dutch Supreme Court ruled that a civil-law notary must only refuse his service if the civil-law notary should realise that the intended acquirer does not have a legitimate interest in the transfer of title (which is the case if third party has a stronger right), or that the intended acquirer would act unlawful in respect of the third party by requiring transfer of title or encumbrance. For the latter it is not sufficient that as a result of the transfer of title or encumbrance the alienator is in breach of contract in respect of a third party.

     

    Click here for the judgment of the Supreme Court.

  • On the basis of the appeal of Houthoff, the Supreme Court quashed on material and unprecidented formal grounds the decision of the Enterprise Chamber in the Meavita-case. The Enterprise Chamber's decision was rendered after the by far most costly investigation so far. It must fully reconsider the whole case.
Bart van der Wiel

Key Contact

Amsterdam
Advocaat | Partner
+31 20 605 61 11
+31 6 2025 0758
Albert Knigge

Key Contact

Amsterdam
Advocaat | Managing Partner
+31 20 605 65 62
+31 6 5184 5323
Alexander van der Voort Maarschalk

Key Contact

Amsterdam
Advocaat | Partner
+31 20 605 61 12
+31 6 5140 5058
Rob Meijer

Key Contact

Amsterdam
Advocaat | Partner
+31 20 605 61 08
+31 6 5149 4309
Jan Frans de Groot

Key Contact

Amsterdam
Advocaat | Partner
+31 20 605 65 44
+31 6 5152 7324