Reputation and crisis management at boardroom level

Reputation and crisis management are key elements of supervisory board members' and supervisors' duties. Establishing and maintaining a strong reputation is vital for building trust among stakeholders, attracting talented staff and fostering long-term relationships. It also aligns with the importance of environmental orientation and meeting society's expectations.
Reputation and crisis management at boardroom level

Crisis situations can damage a carefully built reputation, potentially undermining the company’s long-term success. It is therefore important for management boards to reflect on how to actively incorporate reputation and crisis management into the company’s wider governance.

Strategic reputation management at boardroom level

The management board should be actively involved in developing and implementing reputation management strategies, while supervisory board members and supervisors monitor whether this is done properly. Proactive and transparent measures and communications at boardroom level can positively influence people’s perception of the organisation – and the way they see the management board and supervisory board themselves. This is immensely important in an age of rapidly changing public opinions and expectations.

Identifying and assessing reputational risks

To effectively manage a reputational crisis, it is important to identify and assess the potential risks to the organisation’s reputation at an early stage. This requires taking stock of all relevant internal and external factors. A sound crisis management plan is crucial in that regard: it clearly defines the various roles and responsibilities and provides communication and decision-making protocols. In times of crisis, it is also important to ensure there is a paper trail documenting the decision-making process. This will ensure that the situation cannot subsequently be judged with any hindsight bias.

Evaluating and learning from crises

Crisis situations can also offer opportunities to improve internal processes, help prevent future crises and strengthen the organisation’s overall resilience. It is therefore paramount to thoroughly evaluate crises and integrate lessons learned into future plans. Additionally, explicitly mentioning what went well and what did not helps restore trust inside and outside the organisation. This will boost the company’s reputation.

Reputation and crisis management are key aspects of any organisation. By taking an active approach and implementing effective strategies on these issues, organisations can protect and strengthen their reputation, even in times of crisis. Marry de Gaay Fortman and David Heems contributed to the recently published standard book on reputation management for supervisory board members and supervisors, Reputatiemanagement voor commissarissen en toezichthouders, by reputation and communication expert Frank Peters. In this publication (in Dutch), they explain the liability risks that arise when a supervisory board does not properly perform its duties.

Houthoff has extensive experience advising supervisory board members and supervisors who face a reputational crisis at their organisation. As careful and effective communication is essential in this context, Houthoff regularly works together with reputation and crisis communications experts on this subject.

Governance
Governance and supervision within large corporations and (semi-)public institutions require careful consideration. Supervisory board members often find themselves in a complex position: they must remain sufficiently involved in the company’s management while also maintaining their independent role. Striking the right balance is essential, especially when the pressure is high and the stakes are significant.
Governance stress test
Governance challenges are growing due to shifting regulations, increasing stakeholder pressure and complex international dynamics. Our stress test provides immediate insight into how resilient a company’s governance structure is during events like takeovers, regulatory issues or major legal and legislative developments.
Intensification supervision
In the Netherlands, the roles and responsibilities of directors and supervisory directors are defined by law, providing a clear formal separation of duties. Yet practice shows that effective governance goes beyond these frameworks.
Responsibilities and expectations managing and supervisory directors
For companies with operations in the Netherlands, it is essential to fully understand the legal frameworks and governance expectations for directors and supervisory directors to ensure that those roles and responsibilites are properly fulfilled.

Publications

26 May 2025
26 May 2025
Waarom commissarissen tijdig (her)benoemd moeten worden. Goed Bestuur & Toezicht.
31 October 2024
31 October 2024
Aansprakelijkheidsrisico’s bij onbehoorlijke taakvervulling RvC. F. Peters, Reputatiemanagement voor commissarissen en toezichthouders. Boom 2024.
This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.