Competition Litigation / Private Enforcement

Damages claims resulting from violations of EU and national competition law play an increasingly prominent role in the context of company liability.
Competition Litigation / Private Enforcement

From Administrative Sanctions to Civil Claims

Competition law is no longer used solely by competition authorities to impose administrative sanctions, but also in private enforcement proceedings by private parties under civil law.

A number of key judgments of the European Court of Justice, new legislative initiatives and a growing awareness among injured parties of the possibility to claim compensation have all contributed to this development.

Nowadays, companies that have been fined by a competition authority need to give serious consideration to the possibility that collective ‘follow-on actions’ by injured parties may ensue in the civil courts. The Netherlands has one of the most popular legal systems for bringing such collective follow-on claims. These claims can have a real impact on operations and further damage the reputations of the companies concerned. Preventing or minimising such follow-on damage requires carefully considered litigation and negotiation strategies, as well as legal and financial expertise.

Houthoff’s expertise in Competition Litigation and Private Enforcement

Our experienced Competition Litigation Team has the necessary skills, knowledge and experience in these areas. They work closely with the client to determine the best strategy for bringing the case to a satisfactory close. Where necessary, they also engage the assistance of our experts on substantive competition law.

Our experts are also called upon to assist in ‘stand-alone cases’: cases brought before the civil courts based on a violation of the competition rules, without the violation first being established by a competition authority in administrative proceedings. This involves not only damages claims, but also, for example, actions to access a particular distribution system or to end an abuse of dominance.

Houthoff’s Competition Litigation Team is involved in many of the foremost follow-on and stand-alone cases concerning private enforcement currently before the Dutch courts.

Competition
We advise and assist national and international companies, institutions and governments in procedures before the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets, the European Commission, foreign competition authorities, and the relevant (specialised) courts.
EU Litigation
Companies operating in the EU can be confronted with complex issues of EU law such as free movement rules, EU anti-fraud law, State aid, product regulations, sanctions and trade regulations. Overcoming these issues can involve complex interactions with EU institutions and the EU Courts.
Litigation
Business disputes can have a major impact on your organisation's reputation, continuity and financial position. Conflicts are becoming increasingly common due to growing regulation and social pressure. Shareholder disputes, contractual conflicts, directors' liability and collective actions invariably call for a well thought-out strategy and a thorough understanding of the sector.

Recent
work

Represented LG Electronics succesfully in a competition damages case about cathode ray tubes (CRT). The multi-billion claim was brought before the Dutch civil courts by a Turkish television manufacturer in 2014. The claimant initiated parallel proceedings against the same parties in Turkey, resulting in a final judgment in which was held that the claim was inadmissible against the defendant CRT manufacturers. LG Electronics and its co-defendants successfully argued that the Dutch court should recognise that final Turkish judgment. Accordingly, the Oost-Brabant District Court declared the claims against LG Electronics, Samsung SDI and Technicolor inadmissible.

Represented LG Electronics succesfully in a competition damages case about cathode ray tubes (CRT). The multi-billion claim was brought before the Dutch civil courts by a Turkish television manufacturer in 2014. The claimant initiated parallel proceedings against the same parties in Turkey, resulting in a final judgment in which was held that the claim was inadmissible against the defendant CRT manufacturers. LG Electronics and its co-defendants successfully argued that the Dutch court should recognise that final Turkish judgment. Accordingly, the Oost-Brabant District Court declared the claims against LG Electronics, Samsung SDI and Technicolor inadmissible.

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.