Dispute Resolution

Procesvoering

Geschillen zijn aan de orde van de dag. Zeker in de (internationaal) competitieve markt waarin de meeste cliënten van Houthoff opereren. Een geschil kan een bedrijfsvoering lamleggen. Daarom is ons ervaren Procesrechtteam van 80 advocaten altijd gericht op de oplossing van een geschil en het voorkomen van verrassingen. Het strategisch belang voor de cliënt verliezen onze advocaten daarbij nooit uit het oog.

Waar geschikt kan worden, onderhandelen onze procesrechtadvocaten de beste schikkingsvoorwaarden uit. Waar geprocedeerd moet worden, bijten onze specialisten zich erin vast. Zowel in nationale en internationale mediationprocedures en arbitrages als in procedures bij de Ondernemingskamer, de Hoge Raad en het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie.

  • First Tier firm
    Chambers Global & Europe, Dispute Resolution (2022 Edition)
  • “A client specifies that ‘the quality is good, the lawyers are responsive and they understand both the legal issue and the business’.”
    Chambers Europe, Dispute Resolution (2022 Edition)
  • “Houthoff's services are at a very high level.”
    Chambers Europe, Dispute Resolution (2022 Edition)
  • “A client describes the team as ‘highly responsive, committed and with great insight and knowledge’.”
    Chambers Europe, Dispute Resolution (2022 Edition)
  • First Tier firm
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2022 Edition)
  • “Excellent cross-practices approach to litigation.’”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2022 Edition)
  • “Houthoff is our first choice for advice regarding appeal/cassation before the Supreme Court.’”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2022 Edition)
  • “The team is comprised of exceptionally quick and commercially minded lawyers who devise clever strategies and explain complex cases to clients in a user-friendly way.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2022 Edition)
  • “They are prepared to explain how the law applies, and how the process is in the Netherlands and Europe, helping counsel from other jurisdictions to understand their views and adapt.”
    Chambers Europe, Dispute Resolution (2021 Edition)
  • “A client recognises the practice for its scope, saying that ‘the performance is always excellent, both in terms of legal advice as well as understanding of any risk.’”
    Chambers Europe, Dispute Resolution (2021 Edition)
  • First Tier firm
    Chambers Global & Europe, Dispute Resolution (2021 Edition)
  • “Smart lawyers who understand what is relevant to the client.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2021 Edition)
  • First Tier firm
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2021 Edition)
  • “Analytical thinkers, easy to communicate with, keep their promises.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2021 Edition)
  • “Sources praise the firm for being ‘very proactive and creative’ and ‘always very well prepared in supporting us.’”
    Chambers Europe, Dispute Resolution (2020 Edition)
  • “Clients highlight the team’s international capabilities, noting that they are ‘very good at dealing with cross-border work’ and have ‘very good knowledge of international financing and documentation, and are very good at adapting to different litigation systems.’”
    Chambers Europe, Dispute Resolution (2020 Edition)
  • First Tier firm
    Chambers Global & Europe, Dispute Resolution (2020 Edition)
  • First Tier firm
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2020 Edition)
  • “The team is very quick to respond, friendly, easy to talk to. They team is efficient and very hard-working.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2020 Edition)
  • “The team is very experienced in a wide range of disputes and provides commercial and user-friendly advice.”
    Legal 500, Dispute Resolution: Commercial litigation (2020 Edition)

Onze procesrechtadvocaten staan nationale en internationale ondernemingen, overheden en vrije beroepsbeoefenaars bij. Houthoff heeft een bijzondere positie verworven op het gebied van complexe geschillen waarbij een veelheid aan partijen en/of jurisdicties zijn betrokken. Ons Procesrechtteam deinst daarbij niet terug voor vragen die partijen en de rechter naar onontgonnen gebied leiden.

Onze procesrechtspecialisten werken geïntegreerd samen met onze (sector)experts op het gebied van onder meer financieringen, M&A, milieurecht en verzekeringen en hebben een strategische en resultaatgerichte benadering van geschillen. Zij zijn erkend om hun successen en hebben niet voor niets al jaren achtereen topnoteringen in juridische gidsen als Legal 500 en Chambers Global. Wij kunnen onze procesrechtteams opschalen naar iedere gewenste grootte en meerdere omvangrijke (internationale) procedures tegelijkertijd voeren. Zonder op kwaliteit in te boeten.

  • Advised and acted for Huntsman, successfully defending against claims brought by Ducor Petrochemicals in (appeal) proceedings before the Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal (College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven) regarding regulatory issues relating to Huntsman's closed distribution system for electricity.
  • Represented Ola Cabs in data access request proceedings before the Amsterdam District Court. This was the first judgment by an EU court on data portability.
  • Represented RDW (Dutch Vehicle Licence Authority) before the Dutch DPA and administrative courts in defence of complaints raised by a group of data subjects.
  • Advised Marktplaats, a classified advertising site based in the Netherlands, on preliminary relief proceedings brought by a professional advertiser who was blocked from the platform.
  • Representing Kroonenberg, one of the largest real estate investors in the Netherlands, in a high-profile dispute against the bankruptcy trustees of Memid and Midreth, a large construction company in the Netherlands.
  • Representing members of the supervisory board of Imtech N.V. in various proceedings.
  • Houthoff is defending a major European truck manufacturer against several cartel damages mass claims submitted by claim vehicles allegedly representing haulier companies.

  • Represented a former CFO of a Belgian bank/insurance company in his defence against several prospectus claims, including a mass claim brought by the Dutch Shareholders Association (VEB).
  • V&D was a landmark brand of high street located department stores (63 stores) in the Netherlands and was founded in 1887. Houthoff advised the company in a wide array of matters, including the restructuring of its debt, and representing the company in several high profile litigation matters related to real estate and labour law.
  • Represented Goodyear Dunlop in litigation resulting from a series of incidents.
  • Houthoff represented Nationale Nederlanden (NN) in proceedings that were brought by the foundation Vereniging Woekerpolis.nl in relation to investment-linked insurance offered by NN. The court ruled that generally speaking NN had provided sufficient information on costs and premiums.
  • Houthoff is representing Singapore Airlines Singapore Cargo in various Dutch private enforcement proceedings before the Amsterdam courts. These proceedings were initiated by claim vehicles Equilib, EWD and Stichting Cartel Compensation (SCC) following the EC's decisions in the air cargo case. The first action was initiated in 2010 and all the cases are ongoing.
  • Houthoff is the lead counsel to the private owner of the vast Dutch polder Duchess Hedwige (adjacent to the Belgian border in the southern part of the Province of Zeeland). Houthoff advises the owner and litigates against the Dutch Government regarding the planned project of the Dutch Government to submerge the privately-owned polder (more than 300 hectares of cultivated land) and turn it into estuarine nature.
  • Represented Swiss/Spanish Teka Group in inquiry proceedings before the Enterprise Chamber in Amsterdam. Teka is in dispute with a cluster of minority shareholders. In the action before the Enterprise Chamber of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal, they alleged that Teka has been mismanaged on a number of issues. The court of appeal denied all claims against Teka.
  • Represented Danube Logistics in a significant litigation matter in the Netherlands against several Dutch and Moldovan parties regarding Danube's acquisition of the Giurgiulesti International Free Port in Moldova, including its oil and cargo/container terminals. In this massive international litigation, on behalf of the Danube Logistics group of companies, Houthoff successfully lodged a claim in 2015 before the Amsterdam Court. Opposite parties launched an appeal.
  • Assisted Elliott in inquiry proceedings at the Enterprise Chamber against the paints and chemical group AkzoNobel. Elliott was one of AkzoNobel’s largest shareholders, with an interest in AkzoNobel of more than 5%.
  • Advised Aurelius, through its investment vehicle Capricorn, in lodging several claims in the Netherlands, relating to, among others, (a) the voidance of several intercompany transactions of the Oi Group which have been to the detriment of the group's creditors and (b) to prevent the ailing Brazilian parent company from borrowing any more money from one its Dutch subsidiaries.
  • Advised Vi Holding, the largest shareholder of aluminum multinational Vimetco N.V. on several proceedings in the Netherlands and the UK relating to a transaction with regard to a significant minority stake in Vimetco. Disputes arose with respect to certain obligations under this transaction, and also a third party initiated proceedings in both the UK and the Netherlands following it.

  • Represented a South Korean listed electronics manufacturer in its defence against several cartel damages claims submitted by major CRT purchasers regarding the manufacture of television screens and computer monitors.
  • Advised Ballast Nedam on an appeal case against Max Bögl, a former joint venture partner. Ballast Nedam wins court of appeal case against Max Bögl. The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal in cassation, lodged by Max Bögl. For Ballast Nedam this ruling means an elimination of a risk of over 9 million euros, without further financial impact. Ballast Nedam brought action in 2003 against Max Bögl for breach of contract in the tendering stage of three underground stations on the North-South Line.

Publicaties

View more View less

Key Contact

Amsterdam
Advocaat | Partner
+31 20 605 65 62
+31 6 5184 5323

Key Contact

Amsterdam
Advocaat | Partner
+31 20 605 61 11
+31 6 2025 0758

Key Contact

Amsterdam
Advocaat | Partner
+31 20 605 69 62
+31 6 1851 6628

Key Contact

Rotterdam
Advocaat | Partner
+31 10 217 24 72
+31 6 5155 9271

Key Contact

Rotterdam
Advocaat | Partner
+31 10 217 29 35
+31 6 1486 1531

Key Contact

Amsterdam
Advocaat | Partner
+31 20 605 65 30
+31 6 5184 5353